| Pages: [1] |
1. Add date/time account needs new PLEX to Character Sheet Pilot License pane - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eric Agerwal wrote: On the line it says pilots license in order.... add until... date/time This way I don't have to go out to account management website to find the fact Thank you. That Pilot License Status on your character sheet was put th...
- by Brom MkLeith - at 2013.06.11 00:09:00
|
2. allow POS corp to corp ownership xfers same as POCO - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Yes. Very good idea.
- by Brom MkLeith - at 2012.05.10 15:41:00
|
3. Better tank for the Industrial ships? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Simi Kusoni wrote: Currently high sec is used by risk averse older players who simply wish to avoid actually playing the game at any cost, you wish to take part in building ships yet are not willing to lose them and contribute to demand yourse...
- by Brom MkLeith - at 2012.05.04 15:57:00
|
4. Better tank for the Industrial ships? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Simi Kusoni wrote: I would be fine buffing industrial ships tanks if you were willing to accept a considerable cargo hold / mining yield penalty for being in an NPC corp. Too difficult to implement. But exorbitant fees on buying, selling an...
- by Brom MkLeith - at 2012.05.04 15:56:00
|
5. Better tank for the Industrial ships? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Colonel Xaven wrote: Cardano Firesnake wrote: Instead of making ganking impossible in Highsec, why not giving a better tank to industrial ships ? The answer is simple: Cardano Firesnake wrote: Concord could arrive in time. False...
- by Brom MkLeith - at 2012.05.04 15:17:00
|
6. Better tank for the Industrial ships? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Jack Carrigan wrote: Ahh, this ****thread again. No, you will not get a better tank for Industrial ships. Why? Because they are INDUSTRIAL ships. They are designed to have enough tank to fend of belt rats, not fend off ships designed for comba...
- by Brom MkLeith - at 2012.05.03 21:21:00
|
7. Better tank for the Industrial ships? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Cardano Firesnake wrote: I am surprised to have only one answer. Maybe a lot of folks thought it was some sort of Troll since you are with GSF. It's refreshing to see a Goon ally who isn't foaming at the mouth to be able to torch T2 Exhumers...
- by Brom MkLeith - at 2012.05.03 05:48:00
|
8. Better tank for the Industrial ships? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Cardano Firesnake wrote: It is true that the real problem is the T2 Barges. Just adding more Shield, Armor and Hull hit points could be an enough solution. It would only change the time needed to destroy them without any other option. Or perhar...
- by Brom MkLeith - at 2012.05.03 05:45:00
|
9. Better tank for the Industrial ships? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Caliph Muhammed wrote: What a whiney shiitpost. Ganking is never going to be a one for one trade. So harden the ffuck up. You can't mine without orca support with 8k cargo space? Moron. You are getting neither, more defense, cargo space or dum...
- by Brom MkLeith - at 2012.05.03 05:36:00
|
10. No Aggro at all for Pacifist - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Astroniomix wrote: Brom MkLeith wrote: If I have not shot at, stolen from, ewar'd or helped someones enemy then I should not gain ANY aggro just because someone decides to shoot at me. CCP removed one of the best ways for non-bot miners to ...
- by Brom MkLeith - at 2012.04.25 19:50:00
|
11. No Aggro at all for Pacifist - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
If I have not shot at, stolen from, ewar'd or helped someones enemy then I should not gain ANY aggro just because someone decides to shoot at me. CCP removed one of the best ways for non-bot miners to defend themselves when they made it so you ca...
- by Brom MkLeith - at 2012.04.11 21:28:00
|
12. Large Collidable Structures and Line of Sight Targeting (aka duck amd cover) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I personaly like the idea of LCS's disrupting LOS attacks. It adds realism to the game. I would also like to see it applied to ships blocking LOS. You would see a lot of different real tactics being used and it would bring a new element to all com...
- by Brom MkLeith - at 2012.04.11 21:07:00
|
13. Service to change Character Names - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
MushroomMushroom wrote: Are you insane? Our name is most of our identity in Eve. This service would be exploited like crazy by every scammer, corp thief and aspiring spy in the game. Maybe if there were some safeguards like a publicly viewable ...
- by Brom MkLeith - at 2012.04.11 20:53:00
|
14. Integrate "Uservoice" Style Voting Into Development Lifecycle - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Outstanding suggestion. Let me put in my "+" for that one. I just heard about a rumored change that really upset me but I know that I don't really have a voice since I'm not in a massive null-sec alliance. Mandatory voting per paying account befor...
- by Brom MkLeith - at 2011.03.27 05:45:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |